Robert C. Wilkins v. Betty Merical Happy Smith, and Virginia Department of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

Robert C. Wilkins v. Betty Merical Happy Smith, and Virginia Department of Corrections

60 F.3d 827, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24730, 1995 WL 384635

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 29, 1995

Docket95-6506

StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 827 (Robert C. Wilkins v. Betty Merical Happy Smith, and Virginia Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert C. Wilkins v. Betty Merical Happy Smith, and Virginia Department of Corrections, 60 F.3d 827, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24730, 1995 WL 384635 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

60 F.3d 827
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert C. WILKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Betty MERICAL; Happy Smith, Defendants-Appellees,
and
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant.

No. 95-6506.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 29, 1995.

Robert C. Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Edward Ladd, Jr., PENN, STUART, ESKRIDGE & JONES, Abingdon, VA, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilkins v. Merical, No. CA-94-39 (W.D.Va. Mar. 7, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

60 F.3d 827
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert C. WILKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Betty MERICAL; Happy Smith, Defendants-Appellees,
and
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant.

No. 95-6506.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 29, 1995.

Robert C. Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Edward Ladd, Jr., PENN, STUART, ESKRIDGE & JONES, Abingdon, VA, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilkins v. Merical, No. CA-94-39 (W.D.Va. Mar. 7, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F.3d 827, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24730, 1995 WL 384635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-c-wilkins-v-betty-merical-happy-smith-and-v-ca4-1995.