Robert C. Kessinger v. Ray H. Page, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and the State of Oklahoma

369 F.2d 799
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided December 8, 1966·No. 9002·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The district court denied habeas corpus relief to appellant Kessinger, a prisoner in the Oklahoma penitentiary, on the ground that he had not exhausted his state remedies as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The record shows that appellant has appealed to the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals from his state conviction and that the appeal is pending and undecided. In such circumstances, he has not exhausted his available remedies-in state courts. Lee v. State of Kansas, 10 Cir., 346 F.2d 48. The various claims that he makes can and should be decided in the Oklahoma courts. Nothing is presented to show that the state remedy is ineffective or inadequate.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert C. Kessinger v. Ray H. Page, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and the State of Oklahoma, 369 F.2d 799 (10th Cir. 1966).

369 F.2d 799 (Robert C. Kessinger v. Ray H. Page, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and the State of Oklahoma) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related