Robert C. Eisele and Rita J. Eisele v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

580 F.2d 805, 42 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5886, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 8862
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 21, 1978
Docket78-1237
StatusPublished
Cited by44 cases

This text of 580 F.2d 805 (Robert C. Eisele and Rita J. Eisele v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert C. Eisele and Rita J. Eisele v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 580 F.2d 805, 42 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5886, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 8862 (5th Cir. 1978).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner Robert Eisele filed a petition with the Tax Court on June 4, 1976 seeking relief from the Internal Revenue Service’s determination on March 29,1976 that Eisele in the 1973 taxable year owed additional income taxes in the amount of $14,031.79 and a penalty of $701.59. The Internal Revenue Service then sought discovery of records relating to the deductions claimed by Eisele. Eisele, claiming that these records were privileged under the fifth amendment, refused to produce them. On May 25,1977, the Tax Court determined that the records were not privileged and ordered Eisele to produce them on or before June 8, 1977. Despite this order, Eisele still failed to produce the documents. Accordingly, on June 17, 1977, the Tax Court dismissed the petition and ordered a judgment in favor of the Government.

The Tax Court’s sanctions for failure to comply with discovery are explicitly authorized by Tax Court Rule 104(c)(3), which provides that the court may enter an order “dismissing the case or any part thereof, or rendering a judgment by default against the disobedient party.” We therefore conclude that the Tax Court’s response to Eisele’s continued refusal to produce the documents was proper.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Commissioner
91 T.C. No. 66 (U.S. Tax Court, 1988)
Brown v. Commissioner
1987 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 186 (U.S. Tax Court, 1987)
Pfluger v. Commissioner
1986 T.C. Memo. 78 (U.S. Tax Court, 1986)
Lutz v. Commissioner
1986 T.C. Memo. 13 (U.S. Tax Court, 1986)
Hartman v. Commissioner
1985 T.C. Memo. 482 (U.S. Tax Court, 1985)
Keating v. Commissioner
1985 T.C. Memo. 312 (U.S. Tax Court, 1985)
Hollander v. Commissioner
1985 T.C. Memo. 184 (U.S. Tax Court, 1985)
McCarty v. Commissioner
1985 T.C. Memo. 163 (U.S. Tax Court, 1985)
Williamson v. Commissioner
1985 T.C. Memo. 84 (U.S. Tax Court, 1985)
Delaney v. Commissioner
1985 T.C. Memo. 73 (U.S. Tax Court, 1985)
Baranski v. Commissioner
1984 T.C. Memo. 639 (U.S. Tax Court, 1984)
Kuhn v. Commissioner
1984 T.C. Memo. 638 (U.S. Tax Court, 1984)
Figura v. Commissioner
1984 T.C. Memo. 567 (U.S. Tax Court, 1984)
Romano v. Commissioner
1984 T.C. Memo. 568 (U.S. Tax Court, 1984)
Wedeking v. Commissioner
1984 T.C. Memo. 530 (U.S. Tax Court, 1984)
Burton v. Commissioner
1984 T.C. Memo. 99 (U.S. Tax Court, 1984)
Jackson v. Commissioner
1984 T.C. Memo. 83 (U.S. Tax Court, 1984)
Dick H. Family Estate v. Comm'r
1984 T.C. Memo. 9 (U.S. Tax Court, 1984)
Douglas v. Commissioner
1983 T.C. Memo. 786 (U.S. Tax Court, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
580 F.2d 805, 42 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5886, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 8862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-c-eisele-and-rita-j-eisele-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca5-1978.