Robert Bustamonte v. Merle R. Schneckloth, Superintendent, California Conservation Center

479 F.2d 1047, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 8828
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 12, 1973
Docket25678
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 479 F.2d 1047 (Robert Bustamonte v. Merle R. Schneckloth, Superintendent, California Conservation Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Bustamonte v. Merle R. Schneckloth, Superintendent, California Conservation Center, 479 F.2d 1047, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 8828 (9th Cir. 1973).

Opinion

ELY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Before HAMLIN, MERRILL and

By order of the Supreme Court, Merle R. Schneckloth, Superintendent, Califor *1048 nia Conservation Center v. Robert Clyde Bustamonte, No. 71-732, entered May 29, 1973, 412 U.S. 218, 93 S.Ct. 2041, 36 L.Ed.2d 854, our judgment heretofore entered in this case 448 F.2d 699, was reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings.

Judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. White
702 A.2d 514 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1997)
State v. Arias
661 A.2d 850 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)
State v. Jones
786 S.W.2d 926 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1990)
United States v. Chaney
582 F. Supp. 392 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
479 F.2d 1047, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 8828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-bustamonte-v-merle-r-schneckloth-superintendent-california-ca9-1973.