Robert Burgess v. United States
This text of 304 F.2d 160 (Robert Burgess v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
304 F.2d 160
Robert BURGESS, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 19520.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
June 29, 1962.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida; G. Harrold Carswell, Judge.
Charles Friend, Tallahassee, Fla., for appellant.
Clinton Ashmore, U. S. Atty., R. W. Ervin, III, Asst. U. S. Atty., Tallahassee, Fla., for appellee.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, BELL, Circuit Judge, and SIMPSON, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The error assigned being without substance in law and fact, and having been rendered harmless in any event, the judgment of conviction appealed from is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
304 F.2d 160, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-burgess-v-united-states-ca5-1962.