Robert Buckhalter v. State of Mississippi

CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 3, 1996
Docket96-CA-01005-SCT
StatusPublished

This text of Robert Buckhalter v. State of Mississippi (Robert Buckhalter v. State of Mississippi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Buckhalter v. State of Mississippi, (Mich. 1996).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 96-CA-01005-SCT ROBERT BUCKHALTER A/K/A ROBERT LEE BUCKHALTER v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED, PURSUANT TO M.R.A.P. 35-A MEMORANDUM/PER CURIAM AFFIRMANCE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 9/03/96 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JERRY OWEN TERRY, SR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: STONE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: PRO SE ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

BY: ROGER W. WILLIAMS DISTRICT ATTORNEY: CONO CARANNA NATURE OF THE CASE: CIVIL - POST CONVICTION RELIEF DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED - 10/23/97 MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED: MANDATE ISSUED: 11/13/97

BEFORE PRATHER, P.J., BANKS AND McRAE, JJ.

PRATHER, PRESIDING JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:

Robert Lee Buckhalter pled guilty before the Stone County Circuit Court to armed robbery and escape as an habitual offender. He was sentenced to eight years in prison on the armed robbery charge and five years on the escape charge. The sentences were to run concurrently without eligibility for parole, for a total of eight years in prison without parole. The appeal sub judice arises from the trial court's subsequent denial of post-conviction relief to Buckhalter.

Buckhalter contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel when his attorney failed to demur from the habitual offender portions of the indictments, which portions appeared after the words "against the peace and dignity of the State." Section 169 of the Mississippi Constitution requires that indictments "conclude" with the words "against the peace and dignity of the State." However, such a defect in the indictment is curable by amendment and can be waived by a valid guilty plea. Brandau v. State, 662 So. 2d 1051, 1054-55 (Miss. 1995). For this reason, the performance of Buckhalter's attorney was neither deficient nor prejudicial. Therefore, Buckhalter's argument that he received ineffective assistance of counsel fails. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984).

Buckhalter's appeal is without merit. The judgment of the trial court denying post-conviction relief is affirmed, per curiam.

DENIAL OF POST-CONVICTION RELIEF AFFIRMED.

LEE, C.J., SULLIVAN, P.J., PITTMAN, BANKS, McRAE, ROBERTS, SMITH AND MILLS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Brandau v. State
662 So. 2d 1051 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Robert Buckhalter v. State of Mississippi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-buckhalter-v-state-of-mississippi-miss-1996.