Robert ("Bob") Royal, and RR Royal Ranch Company, a Texas Corporation v. SAPH, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company, and Happy State Bank

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 18, 2016
Docket02-15-00364-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Robert ("Bob") Royal, and RR Royal Ranch Company, a Texas Corporation v. SAPH, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company, and Happy State Bank (Robert ("Bob") Royal, and RR Royal Ranch Company, a Texas Corporation v. SAPH, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company, and Happy State Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert ("Bob") Royal, and RR Royal Ranch Company, a Texas Corporation v. SAPH, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company, and Happy State Bank, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00364-CV

ROBERT (“BOB”) ROYAL AND RR APPELLANTS ROYAL RANCH COMPANY, A TEXAS CORPORATION

V.

SAPH, LLC, A TEXAS LIMITED APPELLEES LIABILITY COMPANY, AND HAPPY STATE BANK

------------

FROM THE 415TH DISTRICT COURT OF PARKER COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. CV15-1178

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On July 8, 2016, we notified appellants that their briefs had not been filed

as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P.

38.6(a). We also notified appellant RR Royal Ranch Company that it had not

timely filed a notice of new lead counsel as ordered by this court. We stated we

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellants or any party

desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response

showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have

not received any response.

Because appellants’ briefs have not been filed, and because appellant RR

Royal Ranch Company has not filed a notice of new lead counsel, we dismiss the

appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 18, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Robert ("Bob") Royal, and RR Royal Ranch Company, a Texas Corporation v. SAPH, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company, and Happy State Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-bob-royal-and-rr-royal-ranch-company-a-texas-corporation-v-texapp-2016.