Robert Becho v. Araceli Ramirez
This text of Robert Becho v. Araceli Ramirez (Robert Becho v. Araceli Ramirez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
____________________________________________________________
ROBERT BECHO, Appellant,
ARACELI RAMIREZ, Appellee.
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
The parties to this appeal have filed a joint motion asking the Court to dismiss this appeal. According to the motion, the parties have remarried and reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences. They ask this Court to render judgment effectuating the parties' agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A).
The parties have agreed that appellee confesses error in the judgment below of the trial court's grant of a permanent injunction against appellant; that appellee confesses error in the judgment below of the trial court's order that appellant owes retroactive child support; that appellee agrees to take nothing with respect to her request for a permanent injunction; and that appellee agrees to take nothing with respect to her request for retroactive child support. The parties' remarriage renders moot the issues concerning conservatorship, possession, and access.
We GRANT the joint motion to dismiss. We RENDER judgment effectuating the parties' settlement agreement, and DISMISS the appeal. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See id. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this 2nd day of July, 2009.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robert Becho v. Araceli Ramirez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-becho-v-araceli-ramirez-texapp-2009.