Robert Bartels v. New York Lithographers' and Photo-Engravers' Union No. One-P, Formerly Known as New York Photo-Engravers' Union No. One

Second Circuit

Robert Bartels v. New York Lithographers' and Photo-Engravers' Union No. One-P, Formerly Known as New York Photo-Engravers' Union No. One

431 F.2d 1205, 75 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2400, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 7290

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedSeptember 17, 1970

Docket34675_1

StatusPublished

This text of 431 F.2d 1205 (Robert Bartels v. New York Lithographers' and Photo-Engravers' Union No. One-P, Formerly Known as New York Photo-Engravers' Union No. One) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert Bartels v. New York Lithographers' and Photo-Engravers' Union No. One-P, Formerly Known as New York Photo-Engravers' Union No. One, 431 F.2d 1205, 75 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2400, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 7290 (2d Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

431 F.2d 1205

Robert BARTELS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NEW YORK LITHOGRAPHERS' AND PHOTO-ENGRAVERS' UNION NO. ONE-P, formerly known as New York Photo-Engravers' Union No. One, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 26.

Docket 34675.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued September 17, 1970.

Decided September 17, 1970.

Solomon D. Monshine, New York City, for appellant.

Moss K. Schenck, Schenck & Schenck, New York City, for appellee.

Before WATERMAN, MOORE and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After argument and in open court we affirm the judgment below upon Judge Levet's findings of fact and conclusions of law, reported at 306 F.Supp. 1266.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI