Robert Barnett v. U.S. Air, Inc.

297 F.3d 1106, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 8619, 13 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 576, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15303
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robert Barnett v. U.S. Air, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 228 F.3d 1105
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 31, 2002·No. 96-16669·Published

Opinion

297 F.3d 1106

Robert BARNETT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
U.S. AIR, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 96-16669.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 31, 2002.

Robert Rychlik, Palm Desert, CA, Richard — Davis, Esq., Surprise, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Marita T. Covarrubias, Esq., McDermott, Will & Emery, Raymond W. Thomas, Esq., Hill, Farrer & Burrill, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court, D.C. No. CV-94-03874-DLJ.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, HUG, B. FLETCHER, PREGERSON, O'SCANNLAIN, TROTT, KLEINFELD, TASHIMA, THOMAS, FISHER and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with U.S. Airways, Inc. v. Barnett, 535 U.S. ___, 122 S.Ct. 1516, 152 L.Ed.2d 589 (2002).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert Barnett v. U.S. Air, Inc., 297 F.3d 1106, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 8619, 13 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 576, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15303 (9th Cir. 2002).

297 F.3d 1106 (Robert Barnett v. U.S. Air, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

US Airways, Inc. v. Barnett
535 U.S. 391 (Supreme Court, 2002)