Robert B. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee

102 F.3d 204, 20 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2064, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 29367
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedNovember 7, 1996
Docket94-1896
StatusPublished

This text of 102 F.3d 204 (Robert B. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert B. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee, 102 F.3d 204, 20 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2064, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 29367 (6th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

102 F.3d 204

20 Employee Benefits Cas. 2064

Robert B. SPRAGUE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants,
v.
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Nos. 94-1896 to 94-1898, 94-1937.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 7, 1996.

Prior report: 92 F.3d 1425.

Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge; MERRITT, KENNEDY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE and COLE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of these cases en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed and the case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

It is further ORDERED that the appellees/cross-appellants file a supplemental brief not later than Friday, December 20, 1996, and the appellant/cross-appellee file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, February 10, 1997. Reargument will be scheduled for Wednesday, April 23, 1997.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 F.3d 204, 20 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2064, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 29367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-b-sprague-plaintiffs-appelleescross-appellants-v-general-motors-ca6-1996.