Robert Arthur Moses v. State
This text of Robert Arthur Moses v. State (Robert Arthur Moses v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered August 28, 2020
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-20-00756-CR
ROBERT ARTHUR MOSES, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219-81377-2015
ORDER
Before the Court is appellant’s August 20, 2020 motion to amend his
docketing statement seeking to attach purported copies of an order from the trial
court and a State’s response as part of an appendix. He further seeks to add a
certification to verify the documents in the appendix.
A docketing statement is filed for administrative purposes and contains basic
information about the case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 33.2. Rule 33.2 specifies the information to be included in the docketing statement. See id. The required
information does not include an appendix of documents. See id.
Accordingly, appellant’s motion is DENIED.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robert Arthur Moses v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-arthur-moses-v-state-texapp-2020.