Robert Argarther Hoard v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 28, 2024
Docket07-24-00233-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Robert Argarther Hoard v. the State of Texas (Robert Argarther Hoard v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Argarther Hoard v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-24-00233-CR

ROBERT ARGARTHER HOARD, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 100th District Court Carson County, Texas Trial Court No. 6387, Honorable Dale A. Rabe Jr., Presiding

October 28, 2024 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ.

Appellant, Robert Argarther Hoard, appeals from the trial court’s judgment

adjudicating him guilty of possession of a controlled substance1 and sentencing him to

fifty years of confinement. Appellant’s appointed counsel now moves to withdraw from

the appeal. According to the motion, Appellant “wishes to raise points on appeal which

1 See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.116. appellate counsel cannot ethically raise” and “has asked appellate counsel to withdraw,

and an attorney outside the [Panhandle Area Public Defender’s Office] to be appointed.”

Because the trial court is responsible for appointing counsel to represent indigent

defendants in criminal cases, as well as relieving or replacing appointed counsel, we

abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court to rule on Appellant’s motion to

withdraw. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. arts. 1.051(d), 26.04(j)(2). Upon remand, the

trial court shall determine (1) whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal; (2)

whether to grant Appellant’s counsel’s motion to withdraw; and (3) if the motion to

withdraw is granted, whether Appellant is indigent and entitled to appointment of new

counsel.

If the trial court grants the motion to withdraw and appoints Appellant new counsel;

the name, address, email address, phone number, and State Bar number of any newly

appointed counsel shall be included in the court’s findings. The trial court may also enter

such orders necessary to address the aforementioned questions. The trial court’s

findings and any orders issued shall be included in a supplemental clerk’s record to be

filed with this Court by November 27, 2024.

All appellate deadlines, including Appellant’s pending briefing deadline, are

suspended until further order of this Court.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 481.116
Texas HS § 481.116

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Robert Argarther Hoard v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-argarther-hoard-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.