Robert Anthony Taylor v. Miranda Drolette

• Court: District Court, E.D. California
• Decided: October 15, 2025
• Docket: 1:25-cv-01362
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 ROBERT ANTHONY TAYLOR, Case No. 1:25-cv-01362-EPG-HC

12 Petitioner, ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE 13 v. EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14 MIRANDA DROLETTE,

15 Respondent.

16 17 Petitioner Robert Anthony Taylor is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for 18 writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 19 When a state prisoner files a habeas petition in a state that contains two or more federal 20 judicial districts, the petition may be filed in either the judicial district in which the petitioner is 21 presently confined or the judicial district in which he was convicted and sentenced. See 28 22 U.S.C. § 2241(d); Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 442 (2004) (quoting Carbo v. United 23 States, 364 U.S. 611, 618, 81 S. Ct. 338, 5 L. Ed. 2d 329 (1961)). Petitions challenging the 24 execution of a sentence are preferably heard in the district where the inmate is confined. See 25 Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). Petitions challenging convictions or 26 sentences are preferably heard in the district of conviction. See Laue v. Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 27 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968). Section 2241 further states that, rather than dismissing an improperly 1 | transfer” the habeas petition to another federal district for hearing and determination. Id.; see also 2 | 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (court may transfer any civil action “to any other district or division where it 3 | might have been brought” for convenience of parties or “in the interest of justice”). 4 Here, Petitioner’s claims relate to a conviction from Sacramento County, which is part of 5 | the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. 6 | Therefore, venue is proper in the Sacramento Division. Local Rule 120(d). 7 Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper 8 | court may, on the Court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper court. Therefore, this action 9 | will be transferred to the Sacramento Division. 10 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 11 1. This action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern 12 | District of California sitting in Sacramento; and 13 2. All future filings shall reference the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall 14 | be filed at: 15 United States District Court Eastern District of California 16 501 “TI” Street, Suite 4-200 7 Sacramento, CA 95814

18 | IS SO ORDERED. 19 | Dated: _October 15, 2025 Fahey — UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28