Robert Anding and Roberta Anding v. City of Austin, Texas And Ferdinand D. Clervi, Austin Municipal Court Judge

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 29, 2020·No. 03-18-00307-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 29, 2020

NO. 03-18-00307-CV

Robert Anding and Roberta Anding, Appellants v.

City of Austin, Texas; and Ferdinand D. Clervi, Austin Municipal Court Judge, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART --

OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on April 30, 2018. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that the district court did not err in denying the Andings’ motion for summary judgment and in granting the City’s motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the City. The Court also holds that the district court did err in sustaining Clervi’s plea to the jurisdiction. The Court therefore reverses the district court’s order sustaining the plea and remands the Andings’ mandamus claim against Clervi to the district court for further proceedings.

Each party shall bear their own costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robert Anding and Roberta Anding v. City of Austin, Texas And Ferdinand D. Clervi, Austin Municipal Court Judge, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Robert Anding and Roberta Anding v. City of Austin, Texas And Ferdinand D. Clervi, Austin Municipal Court Judge (Robert Anding and Roberta Anding v. City of Austin, Texas And Ferdinand D. Clervi, Austin Municipal Court Judge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.