Robert Alton Harris v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin
This text of 961 F.2d 1449 (Robert Alton Harris v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
In a motion filed on April 18, 1992, Appellant, Robert Alton Harris, asks this *1450 court to recall its mandate issued on March 10, 1992, following the denial by the United States Supreme Court of petition for a writ of certiorari. Appellant also petitions this court to grant a rehearing and suggests a rehearing en banc.
Appellant’s motion for recall of the mandate is denied. Appellant has not shown, as required by Zipfel v. Halliburton Co., 861 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1054, 108 S.Ct. 2819, 100 L.Ed.2d 921 (1988), that exceptional circumstances justify a recall of the mandate.
The Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc also is denied as untimely. See Adamson v. Lewis, 955 F.2d 614 (9th Cir.1992) (en banc); Fed.R.App.P. 40. We previously stated, in our order denying Petitioner’s motion for stay of mandate and petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc, filed on March 6, 1992, that no future petition for rehearing would be entertained. See Fed.R.App.P. 41(b).
NOONAN, Circuit Judge, would grant the motion fpr recall of the mandate, and the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
961 F.2d 1449, 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3343, 92 Daily Journal DAR 5450, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 7600, 1992 WL 80978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-alton-harris-v-daniel-vasquez-warden-of-california-state-prison-at-ca9-1992.