Robert Allen v. Norris McMackin Supt.
This text of 837 F.2d 475 (Robert Allen v. Norris McMackin Supt.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Robert ALLEN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Norris McMACKIN, Supt., Respondent-Appellee.
No. 87-3669.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Jan. 26, 1988.
Before MERRITT and RYAN, Circuit Judges, and JOHN W. PECK, Senior Judge.
ORDER
This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the briefs and record, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).
Petitioner filed this action for federal habeas corpus relief (28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254) contesting the constitutionality of a 1986 two-count jury conviction for aggravated robbery and felonious assault. The matter was referred to a magistrate who recommended dismissing the petition. The district court subsequently adopted this recommendation over petitioner's objections. This appeal followed. On appeal the parties have briefed the issues, petitioner proceeding pro se.
Upon consideration, we affirm the dismissal of this petition for the reasons set forth in the magistrate's report and recommendation as adopted in the district court's memorandum opinion of June 30, 1987. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
837 F.2d 475, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 865, 1988 WL 4470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-allen-v-norris-mcmackin-supt-ca6-1988.