Robert Albert Peele v. State of North Carolina, Jim G. Bullock, Superintendent, Sampson County Unit, North Carolina Department of Correction

831 F.2d 1058, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13991, 1987 WL 38816
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 22, 1987
Docket87-7558
StatusUnpublished

This text of 831 F.2d 1058 (Robert Albert Peele v. State of North Carolina, Jim G. Bullock, Superintendent, Sampson County Unit, North Carolina Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Albert Peele v. State of North Carolina, Jim G. Bullock, Superintendent, Sampson County Unit, North Carolina Department of Correction, 831 F.2d 1058, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13991, 1987 WL 38816 (4th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

831 F.2d 1058
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert Albert PEELE, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE of North Carolina, Jim G. Bullock, Superintendent,
Sampson County Unit, North Carolina Department of
Correction, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 87-7558.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 13, 1987.
Decided Oct. 22, 1987.

Robert Albert Peele, appellant pro se.

Richard N. League, Office of Attorney General, for appellees.

Before SPROUSE, ERVIN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that an appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, deny Peele's motion for appointment of counsel, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Peele v. North Carolina, C/A No. 86-1039-HC (E.D.N.C., Feb. 23, 1987).

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
831 F.2d 1058, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13991, 1987 WL 38816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-albert-peele-v-state-of-north-carolina-jim--ca4-1987.