Robert A. Stok, P.A. v. Cabrera
This text of 774 So. 2d 824 (Robert A. Stok, P.A. v. Cabrera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We dismiss this appeal because the notice of appeal was not filed within thirty days of the non-final order denying the appellant’s motion to enforce the charging lien. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(b); Wagner v. Bieley, Wagner & Assocs., 263 So.2d 1 (Fla.1972); Josephthal Lyon & Ross, Inc. v. C & A Financial Programs, Inc., 709 So.2d 1384 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Appellant’s motion for reconsideration did not toll the time for filing an appeal. Richardson v. Watson, 611 So.2d 1254, 1255 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). The order denying appellant’s motion for rehearing is, therefore, not appealable. Bastida v. Vitaver, 590 So.2d 1092, 1092-93 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
774 So. 2d 824, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16903, 2000 WL 1872601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-a-stok-pa-v-cabrera-fladistctapp-2000.