Robert A. Palmer, and Wife, Julie A. Palmer v. Partner's Enterprises, L.P., Midland Mortgage Co., and J. L. Curry, Jr.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Robert A. Palmer, and Wife, Julie A. Palmer v. Partner's Enterprises, L.P., Midland Mortgage Co., and J. L. Curry, Jr.

DecidedMarch 20, 2002

Docket04-02-00002-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Robert A. Palmer, and Wife, Julie A. Palmer v. Partner's Enterprises, L.P., Midland Mortgage Co., and J. L. Curry, Jr. (Robert A. Palmer, and Wife, Julie A. Palmer v. Partner's Enterprises, L.P., Midland Mortgage Co., and J. L. Curry, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert A. Palmer, and Wife, Julie A. Palmer v. Partner's Enterprises, L.P., Midland Mortgage Co., and J. L. Curry, Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

No. 04-02-00002-CV Robert A. PALMER and Julie A. Palmer, Appellants v. PARTNERS ENTERPRISES, L.P., Midland Mortgage Co., and J. L. Curry, Jr., Appellees From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2000-CI-12371 Honorable Martha Tanner, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice

Paul W. Green, Justice

Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 20, 2002

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Pro se appellants Robert A. Palmer and Julie A. Palmer have neither paid the $125 filing fee nor filed a docketing statement with this court. All correspondence sent to the Palmers since the end of January has been returned to this court marked, "Moved, left no address, unable to forward." On February 12, 2002, after neither a brief nor a motion for extension of time had been filed, we ordered appellants to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. This order, too, was returned to the court as undeliverable.

After perfecting an appeal, a pro se appellant must file a docketing statement in the court of appeals that includes appellant's address and telephone number. Tex. R. App. P. 32.1(a)(2). Moreover, if an appellant does not timely file a brief, this court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

No. 04-02-00002-CV Robert A. PALMER and Julie A. Palmer, Appellants v. PARTNERS ENTERPRISES, L.P., Midland Mortgage Co., and J. L. Curry, Jr., Appellees From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2000-CI-12371 Honorable Martha Tanner, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice

Paul W. Green, Justice

Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 20, 2002

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Pro se appellants Robert A. Palmer and Julie A. Palmer have neither paid the $125 filing fee nor filed a docketing statement with this court. All correspondence sent to the Palmers since the end of January has been returned to this court marked, "Moved, left no address, unable to forward." On February 12, 2002, after neither a brief nor a motion for extension of time had been filed, we ordered appellants to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. This order, too, was returned to the court as undeliverable.

After perfecting an appeal, a pro se appellant must file a docketing statement in the court of appeals that includes appellant's address and telephone number. Tex. R. App. P. 32.1(a)(2). Moreover, if an appellant does not timely file a brief, this court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

Do not publish

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Robert A. Palmer, and Wife, Julie A. Palmer v. Partner's Enterprises, L.P., Midland Mortgage Co., and J. L. Curry, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-a-palmer-and-wife-julie-a-palmer-v-partners-texapp-2002.