Robert A. Miller v. Tony Alamo
This text of Robert A. Miller v. Tony Alamo (Robert A. Miller v. Tony Alamo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
_____________
No. 95-3613WA No. 95-3979WA _____________
Robert A. Miller, et al., * * Appellees, * Appeals from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Arkansas. * Tony Alamo, et al.,* * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellants. * _____________
Submitted: July 5, 1996
Filed: November 6, 1996 _____________
Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _____________
PER CURIAM.
Tony Alamo appeals the district court's orders denying Alamo's Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion attacking as void a civil judgment against him, see Miller v. Tony and Susan Alamo Found., 748 F. Supp. 695 (W.D. Ark. 1990), and granting the plaintiffs' fourth petition for attorney's fees and costs. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude no error of law appears, and an extended discussion is not warranted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
*An official caption containing a complete list of parties is on file and available for inspection in the Office of the Clerk of the Court, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Robert A. Miller v. Tony Alamo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-a-miller-v-tony-alamo-ca8-1996.