Robert A. Miller v. B. J. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary

383 U.S. 965
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 4, 1966
Docket406, Misc
StatusPublished

This text of 383 U.S. 965 (Robert A. Miller v. B. J. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert A. Miller v. B. J. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary, 383 U.S. 965 (1966).

Opinion

383 U.S. 965

86 S.Ct. 1278

16 L.Ed.2d 307

Robert A. MILLER, petitioner,
v.
B. J. RHAY, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary.

No. 406, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 4, 1966

Robert A. Miller, pro se.

John J. O'Connell, Atty. Gen. of Washington, and Stephen C. Way, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington granted. Case transferred to the appellate docket and placed on the summary calendar.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Rhay
383 U.S. 965 (Supreme Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
383 U.S. 965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-a-miller-v-b-j-rhay-superintendent-washington-state-scotus-1966.