Roberson v. State of Florida
This text of Roberson v. State of Florida (Roberson v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2024-2836 _____________________________
WALTER JIM ROBERSON JR,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
February 19, 2025
PER CURIAM.
Because the trial court has ruled on Petitioner’s motion for postconviction relief and permitted Petitioner to file an amended motion, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Granville v. State, 382 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).
B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Walter Jim Roberson Jr., pro se, Petitioner.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Roberson v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberson-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.