Roberson v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 19, 2025·No. 1D2024-2836·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D2024-2836

WALTER JIM ROBERSON JR, Petitioner, v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

February 19, 2025

PER CURIAM.

Because the trial court has ruled on Petitioner’s motion for postconviction relief and permitted Petitioner to file an amended motion, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Granville v. State, 382 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).

B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Walter Jim Roberson Jr., pro se, Petitioner.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberson v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Roberson v. State of Florida (Roberson v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.