Roberson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Roberson v. State

400 S.W.3d 867, 2013 WL 2643759, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 706

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 11, 2013·No. No. ED 98684·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Jerry Roberson, appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the [868] detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Jerry Roberson, appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the [868] detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Roberson v. State, 400 S.W.3d 867, 2013 WL 2643759, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 706 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

400 S.W.3d 867 (Roberson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.