Roberson v. State
This text of 167 S.E. 605 (Roberson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tlie defendant was convicted of a misdemeanor (possessing whisky). It is well settled law that any one who aids or abets another in the commission of such an offense is as guilty as the actual perpetrator of the crime. In this case the evidence, though circumstantial, authorized the trial judge (sitting, by consent, without the intervention of a jury) to find that it excluded every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed,.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 S.E. 605, 46 Ga. App. 319, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberson-v-state-gactapp-1933.