Roberson v. State
167 S.E. 605, 46 Ga. App. 319, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 43
Opinion
Tlie defendant was convicted of a misdemeanor (possessing whisky). It is well settled law that any one who aids or abets another in the commission of such an offense is as guilty as the actual perpetrator of the crime. In this case the evidence, though circumstantial, authorized the trial judge (sitting, by consent, without the intervention of a jury) to find that it excluded every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed,.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roberson v. State, 167 S.E. 605, 46 Ga. App. 319, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 43 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).
167 S.E. 605 (Roberson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Herring v. State
95 S.E.2d 21 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Gentry v. State
15 S.E.2d 464 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)