Roberson v. State

167 S.E. 605, 46 Ga. App. 319, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 43
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 25, 1933
Docket22805
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 167 S.E. 605 (Roberson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberson v. State, 167 S.E. 605, 46 Ga. App. 319, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 43 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

Tlie defendant was convicted of a misdemeanor (possessing whisky). It is well settled law that any one who aids or abets another in the commission of such an offense is as guilty as the actual perpetrator of the crime. In this case the evidence, though circumstantial, authorized the trial judge (sitting, by consent, without the intervention of a jury) to find that it excluded every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed,.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Herring v. State
95 S.E.2d 21 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Gentry v. State
15 S.E.2d 464 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 S.E. 605, 46 Ga. App. 319, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberson-v-state-gactapp-1933.