Roberson v. State
This text of 319 S.E.2d 444 (Roberson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Taft Roberson shot and killed Keith Agee with a rifle. He appeals his conviction of murder and sentence to life imprisonment.1
1. Roberson challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. After reviewing the record and facts of the case, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).
2. Roberson contends that the court’s charge to the jury impermissibly shifted the burden of proof to him in violation of Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U. S. 510 (99 SC 2450, 61 LE2d 39) (1979). The trial [240]*240court charged that “a presumption is a conclusion which the law draws from given facts”; that presumptions are rebuttable; and that the State must prove every element of the crime, including intent, beyond a reasonable doubt. In light of the charge as a whole, we find no error in the court’s instructions. The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
319 S.E.2d 444, 253 Ga. 239, 1984 Ga. LEXIS 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberson-v-state-ga-1984.