Roberson v. State

13 S.E. 696, 87 Ga. 209, 1891 Ga. LEXIS 130
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 8, 1891·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Simmons, Justice.

The evidence in this case, which will be found in the official report, was sufficient to sustain the verdict of voluntary manslaughter found by the jury, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence.

The other ground of the motion, that the court erred in admitting the defendant’s statement at the coroner’s inquest, cannot be considered by us, because the motion did not set out what objection was made to the evidence at the time it was introduced, or that any objection was made at that time. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberson v. State, 13 S.E. 696, 87 Ga. 209, 1891 Ga. LEXIS 130 (Ga. 1891).

13 S.E. 696 (Roberson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hawkes Co. v. Cowart Co.
94 S.E. 643 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)