Roberson v. State

596 So. 2d 1250, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4434, 1992 WL 73496
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 15, 1992·No. No. 91-1054·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

FRANK, RICHARD H., Associate Judge.

Johnnie Roberson has appealed from his convictions and sentences for attempted second degree murder with a firearm and aggravated battery with a firearm. We have considered all of his contentions and have concluded that only one has merit. In sentencing the defendant to consecutive sentences of twenty and fifteen years, the trial judge exceeded the permitted range of seven to twenty-two years without stating written reasons for departure. We find no merit in the state’s argument that the judge did not know he was imposing a guidelines departure sentence. Therefore, upon remand the trial court must sentence the defendant to a term within the guidelines permitted range. Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990).

Accordingly, we affirm Roberson’s convictions but reverse the sentences and remand for resentencing within the guidelines.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and GARRETT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberson v. State, 596 So. 2d 1250, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4434, 1992 WL 73496 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

596 So. 2d 1250 (Roberson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cunningham v. State
631 So. 2d 367 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)