Roberson v. State
This text of 375 So. 2d 1111 (Roberson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is by the defendant from a judgment, after a trial without jury, finding the defendant guilty of robbery and the unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense. The points [1112]*1112presented urge (1) that the evidence was insufficient and (2) that the defendant did not receive a fair trial because of an offer by the State of evidence to which the defendant’s objection was sustained.
No error appears on the record. As to the first point, see Simmons v. State, 305 So.2d 178 (Fla.1974); as to the second, see Wilcox v. State, 299 So.2d 48, 50 (Fla.3d DCA 1974).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
375 So. 2d 1111, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberson-v-state-fladistctapp-1979.