Roberson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

Roberson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

396 F. App'x 968

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 4, 2010·No. No. 10-6361·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Lamar Roberson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roberson v. South Carolina, No. 8:09-cv-01333-CMC, 2010 WL 679070 (D.S.C. Feb. 24, 2010). We deny Robinson’s motions for appointment of counsel and for a transcript. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Lamar Roberson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roberson v. South Carolina, No. 8:09-cv-01333-CMC, 2010 WL 679070 (D.S.C. Feb. 24, 2010). We deny Robinson’s motions for appointment of counsel and for a transcript. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Roberson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, 396 F. App'x 968 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

396 F. App'x 968 (Roberson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related