Roberson v. O'Brien

Fourth Circuit

Roberson v. O'Brien

225 F. App'x 191

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 3, 2007·No. No. 07-6233·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Paul Roberson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Roberson v. O’Brien, No. 7:06-cv-00414-sgw (W.D.Va. Jan. 31, 2007; filed Feb. 5, 2007, entered Feb. 6, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Paul Roberson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Roberson v. O’Brien, No. 7:06-cv-00414-sgw (W.D.Va. Jan. 31, 2007; filed Feb. 5, 2007, entered Feb. 6, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Roberson v. O'Brien, 225 F. App'x 191 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

225 F. App'x 191 (Roberson v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related