Roberson v. James E.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Texas
DecidedMay 4, 2020
Docket4:20-cv-01393
StatusUnknown

This text of Roberson v. James E. (Roberson v. James E.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberson v. James E., (S.D. Tex. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT May 04, 2020 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bradley, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION MICHAEL CARDORA ROBERSON, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-20-1393 § JAMES E. BLAKE, JR. et al., § § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Michael Cardora Roberson, an inmate incarcerated in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, has filed a prisoner civil rights complaint. Roberson has not prepaid the filing fee. This action is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Barring a show of imminent danger, under the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, a prisoner may not file an action without prepaying the filing fee if he has, on three or more prior occasions, filed a prisoner action in federal district court or an appeal in a federal court of appeals that was dismissed as frivolous or malicious. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 385 (5th Cir. 1996). Roberson has accumulated at least three such dismissals. He is no longer allowed to proceed without prepaying filing fees under section 1915(g). See Roberson v. Hutchinson, No. 4:20-cv-1406 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 28, 2020); Roberson v. Morgan, No. 4:20-cv-1325 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 16, 2020); Roberson v. McCann, No. 6:18-cv-465 (E.D. Tex. June 17, 2019). Roberson’s complaint, (Docket Entry No. 1), alleges that he was the victim of excessive force by government employees in 2019. He does not claim to be in immediate danger that would warrant waiver of the fee requirement. See Choyce v. Dominguez, 160 F.3d 1068, 1071 (5th Cir. 1998); Banos v. O’Guin, 144 F.3d 883, 884 (5th Cir. 1998). In light of the pleadings and his litigation history, Roberson has failed to show that he is eligible to proceed without prepaying fees. This action is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). SIGNED on May 4, 2020, at Houston, Texas.

LW, Cson Ta Lee H. Rosenthal Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Choyce v. Dominguez
160 F.3d 1068 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)
Adepegba v. Hammons
103 F.3d 383 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Roberson v. James E., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberson-v-james-e-txsd-2020.