Roberson v. Henson

Fourth Circuit

Roberson v. Henson

54 F.3d 774, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17617, 1995 WL 298116

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 17, 1995

Docket94-2503

StatusPublished

This text of 54 F.3d 774 (Roberson v. Henson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roberson v. Henson, 54 F.3d 774, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17617, 1995 WL 298116 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

54 F.3d 774
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Cleven Lewis ROBERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Daniel P. HENSON, III, Executive Director, Housing Authority
of Baltimore City, Defendant-Appellee,
and
Henry CISNEROS, Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban
Development, Defendant.

No. 94-2503.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 28, 1995.
Decided: May 17, 1995.

Cleven Lewis Roberson, Appellant Pro Se. Penelope J. Brown, Maria Giovanna Krapf, Baltimore City Department of Law, Baltimore, MD; Gloria Selena Wilson-Shelton, City Solicitor's Office, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders dismissing some claims and granting summary judgment to the Defendants on others in Appellant's housing discrimination complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Roberson v. Henson, No. CA-94-785 (D. Md. Apr. 21 and Oct. 31, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

54 F.3d 774
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Cleven Lewis ROBERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Daniel P. HENSON, III, Executive Director, Housing Authority
of Baltimore City, Defendant-Appellee,
and
Henry CISNEROS, Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban
Development, Defendant.

No. 94-2503.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 28, 1995.
Decided: May 17, 1995.

Cleven Lewis Roberson, Appellant Pro Se. Penelope J. Brown, Maria Giovanna Krapf, Baltimore City Department of Law, Baltimore, MD; Gloria Selena Wilson-Shelton, City Solicitor's Office, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders dismissing some claims and granting summary judgment to the Defendants on others in Appellant's housing discrimination complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Roberson v. Henson, No. CA-94-785 (D. Md. Apr. 21 and Oct. 31, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 F.3d 774, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17617, 1995 WL 298116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberson-v-henson-ca4-1995.