Roberson v. Franklin
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-10967 Conference Calendar __________________
REGINALD CHARLES ROBERSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
JOHN FRANKLIN, Detention Services Officer; DALLAS COUNTY; JIM BOULES, Dallas County Sheriff,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:95-CV-1442-T - - - - - - - - - - April 19, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Reginald Charles Roberson appeals the dismissal of his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint as frivolous. We have
reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s findings and find
no error in the district court’s determination that the complaint
is frivolous as it is barred by the applicable Texas two-year
statute of limitations. See Roberson v. Franklin, No. 3:95-CV-
1442-T (N.D. Tex. Aug. 15, 1995); Gartrell v. Gaylor, 981 F.2d
254, 256 (5th Cir. 1993).
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-10967 -2-
Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir.
Rule 42.2.
Roberson’s motion for the appointment of counsel on appeal
is DENIED as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roberson v. Franklin (Roberson v. Franklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.