Roberson v. Commonwealth

147 S.W. 1, 148 Ky. 630, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 479
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedMay 31, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 147 S.W. 1 (Roberson v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roberson v. Commonwealth, 147 S.W. 1, 148 Ky. 630, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 479 (Ky. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Opinion op the Court by

Chiep Justice Hobson — ■

Affirming.

Letch Roberson was indicted in the Carlisle Circuit Court for the crime of robbery, it being charged in the indictment that he feloniously took $18, the property of [631]*631Eula Roberson, from her person and against her will, forcibly and by putting her in fear. On the trial before a jury, he was found guilty of the charge, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary from two to ten years. He appeals.

The mattérs relied on for reversal occurred on the trial, and no bill of exceptions was filed. The record contains an order granting an appeal, but there is no order in the record relating to a bill of exception in any way, and there is no bill of exception in the' record. The transcript of the evidence heard on the trial, and certified by the official stenographer, has been filed in this court, but it is not approved by the circuit judge. The only way in which rulings of the circuit court on the trial may be brought to this court for review, is by bill of exceptions filed in the circuit court, as provided by the Code of Practice. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, it must be presumed that the circuit court ruled right. The record before us is entirely silent as to the instructions given to the jury by the court, and the transcript of the evidence cannot be considered, as it is not properly certified and was not filed in the circuit court.

We have examined, however, the transcript of the evidence, and do not find that it affords appellant any ground of complaint, the testimony for the Commonwealth made out a case against him, and the verdict of the jury is sustained by the weight of the testimony.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schoffman v. Commonwealth
243 S.W. 292 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1922)
Tull v. Commonwealth
219 S.W. 409 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
147 S.W. 1, 148 Ky. 630, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberson-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1912.