Roberson v. Boone

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Roberson v. Boone

89 S.E.2d 158, 242 N.C. 598, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 640

DecidedSeptember 21, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.E.2d 158 (Roberson v. Boone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roberson v. Boone, 89 S.E.2d 158, 242 N.C. 598, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 640 (N.C. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs contend that under the provisions of G.S. 45-21.34, they are entitled to have the ruling of the court below reversed and the temporary restraining order continued to the hearing.

In our opinion, no legal or equitable ground has been shown that would justify the continuance of the temporary restraining order heretofore issued in this cause, pursuant to the provisions of the above statute or otherwise. Hence, the ruling of the court below is

Affirmed.

WiNBORNE and Higgins, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs contend that under the provisions of G.S. 45-21.34, they are entitled to have the ruling of the court below reversed and the temporary restraining order continued to the hearing.

In our opinion, no legal or equitable ground has been shown that would justify the continuance of the temporary restraining order heretofore issued in this cause, pursuant to the provisions of the above statute or otherwise. Hence, the ruling of the court below is

Affirmed.

WiNBORNE and Higgins, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 S.E.2d 158, 242 N.C. 598, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberson-v-boone-nc-1955.