Roberson, Tevin Donnell
This text of Roberson, Tevin Donnell (Roberson, Tevin Donnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-65,105-01
TEVIN D. ROBERSON, Relator
v.
THE DISTRICT CLERK OF DALLAS COUNTY, Respondent
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
CAUSE NOS. W94-58817-K, W94-39859-K, W94-39860-K, W94-39861-K
IN CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 4 OF DALLAS COUNTY
The order was delivered per curiam.This is an original application for a writ of mandamus.
Relator contends that he filed applications for writs of habeas corpus in Criminal District Court No. 4 of Dallas County, but that the applications have not been forwarded to the Court of Criminal Appeals even though more than thirty-five days have elapsed. Relator's contentions present a colorable claim to have prompt resolution of any grounds raised in such an application.
It is this Court's opinion that additional information is required before a decision can be reached. Therefore, the Respondent, District Clerk of Dallas County, is ordered to file with this Court within thirty days a response by submitting the records on such applications or a copy of a timely entered orders designating issues to be investigated, see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992), or by stating the nature of any applications filed by Relator such that they are not filed pursuant to Article 11.07, § 3, V.A.C.C.P., or that no applications by applicant have been filed.
IT IS SO ORDERED this the 12th day of JULY, 2006.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Roberson, Tevin Donnell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberson-tevin-donnell-texcrimapp-2006.