Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/ROBENSON v. McNeil

ROBENSON v. McNeil

31 So. 3d 803, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17541, 2009 WL 4030856
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 24, 2009
Docket1D09-2834
StatusPublished

This text of 31 So. 3d 803 (ROBENSON v. McNeil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ROBENSON v. McNeil, 31 So. 3d 803, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17541, 2009 WL 4030856 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(b); Hollingsworth v. Szczecina, 731 So.2d 790 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (dismissing appeal as untimely where mandamus proceedings below were civil in nature and appellate rights may be preserved by filing motion for relief in trial court); Mobley v. McNeil, 989 So.2d 1215, 1217 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (dismissing appeal because an order on motion for rehearing is not independently reviewable).

KAHN, BENTON, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mobley v. McNeil
989 So. 2d 1215 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Hollingsworth v. Szczecina
731 So. 2d 790 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 So. 3d 803, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17541, 2009 WL 4030856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robenson-v-mcneil-fladistctapp-2009.