Robenson v. J. B. Ross & Son

40 Ga. 375
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 15, 1869
StatusPublished

This text of 40 Ga. 375 (Robenson v. J. B. Ross & Son) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robenson v. J. B. Ross & Son, 40 Ga. 375 (Ga. 1869).

Opinion

Warner, J.

On the state of facts disclosed by the record in this case, we will not control the discretion of the Court below in refusing to dissolve the injunction, and revoking the order appointing a Receiver to take charge of and secure the crop and other property on the plantation, for the present year ; but if, in the discretion of the Court below, it should bé necessary to keep the property and plantation in the' hands of a Receiver until the termination of the litigation between the parties, then, in our judgment, the complainants should Ibe' required to fprnish all the necessary means and supplies to the Receiver to make a crop, and carry on the plantation for the ensuing year, as is specified in the written agreement for the lease of the premises, for the mutual benefit of the parties [386]*386interested, as stipulated in that agreement; and in the event the complainants shall failpr refuse to do so, then, that the order appointing a Receiver should be revoked and set aside.

Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 Ga. 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robenson-v-j-b-ross-son-ga-1869.