Robel v. Nassir, No. Spnh 9804-54492 (May 8, 1998)

Connecticut Superior Court

Robel v. Nassir, No. Spnh 9804-54492 (May 8, 1998)

1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 6440

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedMay 8, 1998

DocketNo. SPNH 9804-54492

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 6440 (Robel v. Nassir, No. Spnh 9804-54492 (May 8, 1998)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robel v. Nassir, No. Spnh 9804-54492 (May 8, 1998), 1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 6440 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION General Statutes § 47a-23 (c) requires that a notice to CT Page 6441 quit in a summary process action be "delivered to each lessee or occupant or left at his place of residence or, if the rental agreement or lease concerns commercial property, at the place of the commercial establishment by a proper officer or indifferent person."

The sheriff's original return of service of the notice to quit in this summary process action, which does not concern commercial property, reflects that abode service was made on the defendant at a place that was not his residence. The action was returnable to this court on April 24, 1998. On May 1, 1998, the defendant moved to dismiss based on this defect. On the day the motion came before this court, the plaintiff filed an amended return of the sheriff, showing that in-hand service of the notice to quit had been made on the defendant. The defendant objected to the consideration of this amended return. The plaintiff did not seek a continuance to meet this objection.

The filing of such amended returns by sheriffs is not uncommon. See, e.g., Shadmar, Inc. v. Alter, Superior Court, judicial district of Hartford, New Britain No. 54526 (16 Conn. L. Rptr. 612) (May 3, 1996). Whether to allow the filing of an amended return, even long after an action has been returned to court, is in the discretion of the court. Palmer v. Taylor,28 Conn. 237, 242-244 (1859). In the absence of a showing of prejudice or that the sheriff's amended return is inaccurate, the court exercises its discretion to allow the amended return.

The motion to dismiss is denied.

BY THE COURT

Bruce L. LevinJudge of the Superior Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION General Statutes § 47a-23 (c) requires that a notice to CT Page 6441 quit in a summary process action be "delivered to each lessee or occupant or left at his place of residence or, if the rental agreement or lease concerns commercial property, at the place of the commercial establishment by a proper officer or indifferent person."

The sheriff's original return of service of the notice to quit in this summary process action, which does not concern commercial property, reflects that abode service was made on the defendant at a place that was not his residence. The action was returnable to this court on April 24, 1998. On May 1, 1998, the defendant moved to dismiss based on this defect. On the day the motion came before this court, the plaintiff filed an amended return of the sheriff, showing that in-hand service of the notice to quit had been made on the defendant. The defendant objected to the consideration of this amended return. The plaintiff did not seek a continuance to meet this objection.

The filing of such amended returns by sheriffs is not uncommon. See, e.g., Shadmar, Inc. v. Alter, Superior Court, judicial district of Hartford, New Britain No. 54526 (16 Conn. L. Rptr. 612) (May 3, 1996). Whether to allow the filing of an amended return, even long after an action has been returned to court, is in the discretion of the court. Palmer v. Taylor,28 Conn. 237, 242-244 (1859). In the absence of a showing of prejudice or that the sheriff's amended return is inaccurate, the court exercises its discretion to allow the amended return.

The motion to dismiss is denied.

BY THE COURT

Bruce L. LevinJudge of the Superior Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 6440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robel-v-nassir-no-spnh-9804-54492-may-8-1998-connsuperct-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack