Robbins v. Vanderbeck
This text of 26 A. 919 (Robbins v. Vanderbeck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Error is assigned upon a judgment of non-suit ordered at the Circuit. Question touching such a judgment must be presented by a bill of exceptions, returned with the writ of error. In place of such a bill in the present case, counsel seek to substitute their stipulation. Such stipulation will not answer. In absence of the bill of exceptions, error cannot be assigned upon matter which such bill should contain, neither can the judgment below be reversed. Rev., p. 887, § 245.
The judgment will be affirmed.
[365]*365For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Magie, Reed, Van Syckel,, Bogert, Brown, Clement, Smith. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 A. 919, 55 N.J.L. 364, 26 Vroom 364, 1893 N.J. LEXIS 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robbins-v-vanderbeck-nj-1893.