Robbins v. Vanderbeck

26 A. 919, 55 N.J.L. 364, 26 Vroom 364, 1893 N.J. LEXIS 28
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 15, 1893·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Error is assigned upon a judgment of non-suit ordered at the Circuit. Question touching such a judgment must be presented by a bill of exceptions, returned with the writ of error. In place of such a bill in the present case, counsel seek to substitute their stipulation. Such stipulation will not answer. In absence of the bill of exceptions, error cannot be assigned upon matter which such bill should contain, neither can the judgment below be reversed. Rev., p. 887, § 245.

The judgment will be affirmed.

[365]*365For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Magie, Reed, Van Syckel,, Bogert, Brown, Clement, Smith. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robbins v. Vanderbeck, 26 A. 919, 55 N.J.L. 364, 26 Vroom 364, 1893 N.J. LEXIS 28 (N.J. 1893).

26 A. 919 (Robbins v. Vanderbeck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lyons
58 A. 398 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1904)
Davis v. Littel
46 A. 631 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1900)
Wanamassa Amusement Park Ass'n v. Clark
41 A. 153 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1898)