Robbins v. Upton
20 F. Cas. 865, 5 D.C. 498, 5 Cranch 498
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedNovember 15, 1838
StatusPublished
This text of 20 F. Cas. 865 (Robbins v. Upton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Robbins v. Upton, 20 F. Cas. 865, 5 D.C. 498, 5 Cranch 498 (circtddc 1838).
Opinion
The Court and bar said that it was never required by the practice of this Court.
Mr. Bradley contended that it was no objection to bail, that he was indorser upon the bills, and cited Petersdorf on Bail, 281.
To this the Court seemed to assent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
20 F. Cas. 865, 5 D.C. 498, 5 Cranch 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robbins-v-upton-circtddc-1838.