Robbins v. Travelers Insurance
This text of 241 A.D. 350 (Robbins v. Travelers Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaint states a cause of action, at least for the amount of the disability benefits which had accrued and were unpaid at the time of the institution of the action. The order denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and to vacate the attachment must, therefore, be affirmed, without consideration of the right of the plaintiff to recover the total value of the policy on the theory of anticipatory breach.
The order should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a motion by the defendant to reduce the amount of the attachment.
Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.
Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a motion by the defendant to reduce the amount of the attachment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 A.D. 350, 272 N.Y.S. 551, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robbins-v-travelers-insurance-nyappdiv-1934.