Robbins v. Travelers Insurance

241 A.D. 350, 272 N.Y.S. 551, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8247
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 8, 1934·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The complaint states a cause of action, at least for the amount of the disability benefits which had accrued and were unpaid at the time of the institution of the action. The order denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and to vacate the attachment must, therefore, be affirmed, without consideration of the right of the plaintiff to recover the total value of the policy on the theory of anticipatory breach.

The order should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a motion by the defendant to reduce the amount of the attachment.

Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a motion by the defendant to reduce the amount of the attachment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robbins v. Travelers Insurance, 241 A.D. 350, 272 N.Y.S. 551, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8247 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

241 A.D. 350 (Robbins v. Travelers Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gordon v. Continental Casualty Co.
91 A.D.2d 987 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
McCann v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
48 Misc. 2d 325 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)
Kuhn v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California
37 F. Supp. 102 (S.D. New York, 1941)
Robbins v. Travelers Insurance
155 Misc. 384 (New York Supreme Court, 1934)