Robbins v. State
This text of 843 S.W.2d 570 (Robbins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Appellant was convicted of kidnapping and aggravated sexual assault and his punishment was assessed by a jury at ten years and seventy-five years confinement, respectively. These convictions were affirmed. Robbins v. State, 827 S.W.2d 626 (Tex.App.—Beaumont, 1992).1 Appellant seeks discretionary review of the Court of Appeals’ holding that evidence of unadjudi-cated extraneous offenses was admissible in the punishment phase of trial.
During the punishment phase, the trial court admitted testimony from four witnesses concerning extraneous assaults Appellant had committed which did not result in final convictions. The Court of Appeals held that this evidence was admissible under the 1989 amendment to Art. 37.07, § 3(a), V.A.C.C.P.
The Court of Appeals’ opinion was handed down before our decision in Grunsfeld v. State, 843 S.W.2d 521 (Tex.Cr.App.1992). We therefore grant Appellant’s petitions in Nos. 798-92 and 799-92,2 reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remand the cause to that court for reconsideration in light of our decision in Grunsfeld.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
843 S.W.2d 570, 1992 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 227, 1992 WL 360554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robbins-v-state-texcrimapp-1992.