Robbins v. State
706 S.W.2d 351
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robbins v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1984 Tex. App. LEXIS 5105 →
Opinions
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
The State, in its Motion for Rehearing of 705 S.W.2d 398, urges us to hold the Speedy Trial Act, TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC. ANN. art. 32A.02 (Vernon Supp.1986), unconstitutional for the reason that the caption of said Act does not comply with the requirements of TEX. CONST, art. Ill, sec. 35.
This Court addressed this contention in the case of Wright v. State, 696 S.W.2d 288 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1985, no pet.), and the majority held that the Act was constitutional, therefore, the State’s Motion for Rehearing is overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Robbins v. State, 706 S.W.2d 351 (Tex. Ct. App. 1986).
706 S.W.2d 351 (Robbins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wright v. State
696 S.W.2d 288 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Robbins v. State
705 S.W.2d 398 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)