Robbins v. State
This text of 381 So. 2d 1370 (Robbins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ernest ROBBINS, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Karen M. Gottlieb, Asst. Public Defender, Miami, for petitioner.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and James H. Greason, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
This cause is before the Court on petition for certiorari to review the decision of the lower tribunal, Robbins v. State, 364 So.2d 871 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), which conflicts with this Court's decision in Johnson v. State, 366 So.2d 418 (Fla. 1978). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
We grant certiorari and remand to the district court for reconsideration in light of this Court's decision in Johnson.
It is so ordered.
ENGLAND, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, SUNDBERG, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
381 So. 2d 1370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robbins-v-state-fla-1980.