Robbins v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Robbins v. State

89 So. 846, 18 Ala. App. 157, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 129

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 17, 1921

Docket6 Div. 846.

StatusPublished

This text of 89 So. 846 (Robbins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robbins v. State, 89 So. 846, 18 Ala. App. 157, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 129 (Ala. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This defendant was convicted under the second count of an affidavit which charged that “ * * * he did keep, or have in his possession, or receive or possess, spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors, or other prohibited alcoholic liquor or beverage,” etc. Failing to pay the fine and cost, the court sentenced defendant to hard labor for the county on October 18, 1920. From the judgment and sentence he appeals. The trial judge certifies to this court that no hill of exceptions has been presented to him in this case for his approval and signature, and that the time prescribed by law for the presentation of a bill of exceptions has expired. The record appears regular, and no error is apparent thereon. It follows that the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

This defendant was convicted under the second count of an affidavit which charged that “ * * * he did keep, or have in his possession, or receive or possess, spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors, or other prohibited alcoholic liquor or beverage,” etc. Failing to pay the fine and cost, the court sentenced defendant to hard labor for the county on October 18, 1920. From the judgment and sentence he appeals. The trial judge certifies to this court that no hill of exceptions has been presented to him in this case for his approval and signature, and that the time prescribed by law for the presentation of a bill of exceptions has expired. The record appears regular, and no error is apparent thereon. It follows that the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 So. 846, 18 Ala. App. 157, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robbins-v-state-alactapp-1921.