Robbins v. State

49 Ala. 394
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

BBICKELL, J.

— The separation of the jury, the prisoner not objecting, was a matter within the discretion of the court, and cannot be made the subject of revision on error. If it was irregular, or if any injury to the accused resulted from it, it is matter on which to ground an application for a new trial. We concur in all that is said on this point by Chief Justice Peck, in the case of Williams v. The State, 45 Ala. 57. It is the safer practice, especially in cases of felonies, not to permit the jury to depart the presence of the court, even on an adjournment, unless attended by a sworn officer, and not to permit them to separate even then.

Let the judgment of the court below be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robbins v. State, 49 Ala. 394 (Ala. 1873).

49 Ala. 394 (Robbins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
217 So. 2d 551 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1969)
Mitchell v. State
14 So. 2d 132 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1943)
Arnett v. State
141 So. 699 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)
Salmon v. Salmon
69 So. 304 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)
Pearson v. State
59 So. 526 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1912)
James v. State
53 Ala. 380 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1875)