Robbins v. Robbins

2 Ind. 74
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1850·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

THIS was a bill in chancery to correct a mistake in a deed. A part of the defendants were infants. No process appears to have been served upon these infants, but a guardian ad litem was appointed, who, the record states, waived the service of the process on them. This he could not do — see Hough v. Canby, 8 Blackf. 301 — unless the heirs were present in Court, which does not appear, and, on error, cannot be presumed. For this error we are compelled to reverse the decree below, with costs.

The decree is reversed. Cause remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robbins v. Robbins, 2 Ind. 74 (Ind. 1850).

2 Ind. 74 (Robbins v. Robbins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

WATSON ETC. v. Dept. of Public Welfare
165 N.E.2d 770 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1960)
Harris, Et Ux. v. Souder, Supt., Etc.
119 N.E.2d 8 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1954)
Bell v. Bell
39 P.2d 629 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1934)
Noble State Bank v. Haskell
1909 OK 213 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1909)
In re Estate of Harris
3 Coffey 1 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1908)
Strayer v. Long
3 S.E. 372 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1887)
Crane v. Kimmer
77 Ind. 215 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)
Hawkins v. Hawkins' Administrator
28 Ind. 66 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1867)
Abdil v. Abdil
26 Ind. 287 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1866)