Robbins v. Robbins
This text of 36 So. 2d 786 (Robbins v. Robbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We find from a careful examination of the record before this Court that the final decree entered by the Chancellor is sustained by substantial evidence except as to the allowance of $2500.00 Master’s fee.
*826 With reference to the continuation of alimony pendente lite in the sum of $65.00 per week during the pendency of this appeal without crediting it upon the award for permanent alimony,- we will not assume that the Chancellor will fail to enter an equitable order when he ultimately rules upon this question.
The decree appealed from should be modified by reducing the fee of the Special Master from the sum of $2500.00 to the sum of $1200.00. When so modified, the decree shall stand affirmed.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 So. 2d 786, 160 Fla. 825, 1948 Fla. LEXIS 935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robbins-v-robbins-fla-1948.